Vol. 20 No. 3 (2023): Journal of Non Destructive Testing and Evaluation (JNDE), Sept 2023
Research Papers

Robotic Ultrasonic Pulse Velocimetry for Submerged Concrete Assets

Susheel Patil
1Planys Technologies Pvt. Ltd., No. 5, Balaji Nagar Main Road, Puzhuthivakam, Chennai, India
Ashish Anthony Jacob
Planys Technologies Pvt. Ltd., No. 5, Balaji Nagar Main Road, Puzhuthivakam, Chennai, India
Vineet Upadhyay
Planys Technologies Pvt. Ltd., No. 5, Balaji Nagar Main Road, Puzhuthivakam, Chennai, India
Tanuj Jhunjhunwala
Planys Technologies Pvt. Ltd., No. 5, Balaji Nagar Main Road, Puzhuthivakam, Chennai, India
Prabhu Rajagopal
Centre for Nondestructive Evaluation, Machine Design Section, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, Chennai, India
Krishnan Balasubramanium
Centre for Nondestructive Evaluation, Machine Design Section, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, Chennai, India

Published 10-09-2023

Keywords

  • Remote operated vehicles,
  • Non-destructive testing,
  • Ultrasonic pulse velocimetry,
  • concrete,
  • Water saturation,
  • Marine growth,
  • Asset management
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Patil, S., Jacob, A. A., Upadhyay, V., Jhunjhunwala, T., Rajagopal, P., & Balasubramanium, K. (2023). Robotic Ultrasonic Pulse Velocimetry for Submerged Concrete Assets. Journal of Non-Destructive Testing and Evaluation (JNDE), 20(3), 58–66. Retrieved from https://jnde.isnt.in/index.php/JNDE/article/view/61

Abstract

Concrete structures play a vital role in civil, commercial, and industrial projects. Periodic inspections are mandatory to ensure the safety and reliability of the asset throughout their lifespan. Recently, advancements in inspection technology have allowed for rapid and accurate assessment. Techniques ranging from ground penetrating radar to phased array ultrasonic tomography have made it possible to rapidly analyse the interior of concrete structures. Conventionally, inspecting concrete structures underwater is done visually by manned diving teams. Internal defects are often undetected in visual inspection. Furthermore, manual inspection underwater is often challenging owing to limited visibility, water currents, and debris, making it risky for divers to conduct inspections manually. However, as of date, there are no commercially available quantitative non-destructive techniques (NDT) to inspect submerged concrete assets. We have also observed no research adopting existing techniques for underwater applications. To address this need, this paper proposes the use of remotely operated underwater vehicles (ROVs) to adopt conventional ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) technique for underwater applications. ROV-UPV can identify zones of inhomogeneity within the concrete structure. The paper further discusses how factors like water saturation, marine growth, and the inspection surface affect the pulse velocity. Experimental studies conducted in the laboratory and in the field are discussed. Limitations of ROV UPV in practical scenarios are briefly discussed. This work will be of relevance to waterways managers, dam or reservoir engineers, and bridge management authorities. 

References

  1. A. M. Alani, M. Aboutalebi and Kilic, “NDT & E International Integrated health assessment strategy using NDT for reinforced concrete bridges,” NDT E Int., vol. 61, pp. 80-94, 2014
  2. S. K. U. Rehman, Z. Ibrahim, S. A. Memon and M. Jameel, “Nondestructive test methods for concrete bridges: A review,” Construction and Building Materials vol. 107, pp. 58-60, 2016.
  3. “A1020 MIRA LITE,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://dev.acs-international.com/product/a1020-mira-lite/.
  4. “Portable Ground Penetrating Radar - Proceq GP8000,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.screeningeagle.com/en/products/proceq-gp8000.
  5. U. Vineet, G. Sanchit and A. Pulkit, “Multi-functional Remotely Operated Submersible Vehicle (ROV) System”. India Patent 201741022485, 2016.
  6. Guidebook on non-destructive testing of concrete structures, Vienna: Industrial Applications and Chemistry Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, 2002.
  7. J. H. Bungey, “The validity of ultrasonic pulse velocity testing of in-place concrete for strength,” NDT Int, vol. 13, p. 296–300, 1980.
  8. H. Güneyli, S. Karahan, A. Güneyli and N. Yapιcι, “Water Content and Temperature Effect on Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity of Concrete,” Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing vol. 53, pp. 159-166, 2017.
  9. ASTM C597 – 16: Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity Through Concrete.
  10. U. Lencis, A. Udris and A. Korjakins, “Moisture Effect on the Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity in Concrete Cured under Normal Conditions and at Elevated Temperature,” Construction Science 14, 2013