Vol. 21 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Non Destructive Testing and Evaluation (JNDE), March 2024
Research Papers

Future of Non-Destructive Testing in the Era of Additive Manufacturing and Machine Learning

Published 10-03-2024

Keywords

  • Non-destructive testing,
  • Additive manufacturing,
  • Machine learning,
  • Thermal imaging,
  • Artificial intelligence

How to Cite

Nikhil Gupta. (2024). Future of Non-Destructive Testing in the Era of Additive Manufacturing and Machine Learning. Journal of Non Destructive Testing and Evaluation (JNDE), 21(1), 47–54. Retrieved from https://jnde.isnt.in/index.php/JNDE/article/view/78

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) methods have become mainstream in many industry sectors, especially aeronautics and space structures, where production volume for components is low and designs are highly customized. The frequency of launching space missions is increasing around the world. Some of these missions are sending landers and rovers to moon, mars, and other planets. Such space structures require numerous parts that are unique in design or are produced in just one or a very small production run. Such parts produced for high stake and very expensive missions require complete confidence in the quality of each part. Characterization of parts manufactured by AM is a significant challenge for many existing methods due to the geometric complexity, feature size in the structure, and size of the part. This paper discusses various challenges in applying current characterization methods to the AM sector. Machine learning (ML) methods are considered promising in materials and manufacturing fields. However, generating the training dataset by creating a large number of parts is expensive and impractical. New methods are required to train the ML algorithms on small datasets, especially for parts of unique geometry that are produced in limited production run such as space structures.

References

  1. Soori, M., B. Arezoo, and R. Dastres, Virtual manufacturing in Industry 4.0: A review. Data Science and Management, 2024. 7(1): p. 47-63.
  2. Mahesh, P., A. Tiwari, C. Jin, et al., A Survey of Cybersecurity of Digital Manufacturing. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2021. 109(4): p. 495-516.
  3. AbouelNour, Y. and N. Gupta, In-situ monitoring of sub-surface and internal defects in additive manufacturing: A review. Materials & Design, 2022. 222: p. 111063.
  4. AbouelNour, Y. and N. Gupta, In-process thermal imaging to detect internal features and defects in fused filament fabrication. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2023. 129(7): p. 3475-3483.
  5. AbouelNour, Y. and N. Gupta, Assisted defect detection by in-process monitoring of additive manufacturing using optical imaging and infrared thermography. Additive Manufacturing, 2023. 67: p. 103483.
  6. AbouelNour, Y. and N. Gupta, Comparison of In-situ Nondestructive Testing and Ex-situ Methods in Additive Manufactured Specimens for Internal Feature Detection. Research in Nondestructive Evaluation, 2024. 35(1): p. 20-31.
  7. Srivastava, H., H. Pearce, G. Mac, and N. Gupta, Determination of Fiber Content in 3-D Printed Composite Parts Using Image Analysis. IEEE Embedded Systems Letters, 2022. 14(3): p. 115-118.
  8. Cerniglia, D. and N. Montinaro, Defect Detection in Additively Manufactured Components: Laser Ultrasound and Laser Thermography Comparison. Procedia Structural Integrity, 2018. 8: p. 154-162.
  9. Chen, F., J. Zabalza, P. Murray, S. Marshall, J. Yu, and N. Gupta, Embedded product authentication codes in additive manufactured parts: Imaging and image processing for improved scan ability. Additive Manufacturing, 2020. 35: p. 101319.
  10. Chen, F., J.H. Yu, and N. Gupta, Obfuscation of Embedded Codes in Additive Manufactured Components for Product Authentication. Advanced Engineering Materials, 2019. 21(8): p. 1900146.
  11. Juhasz, M., R. Tiedemann, G. Dumstorff, et al., Hybrid directed energy deposition for fabricating metal structures with embedded sensors. Additive Manufacturing, 2020. 35: p. 101397.
  12. Yeh, C.-H., N. Jeyaprakash, and C.-H. Yang, Temperature dependent elastic modulus of HVOF sprayed Ni-5%Al on 304 stainless steel using nondestructive laser ultrasound technique. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2020. 385: p. 125404.
  13. Wu, H.c., N. Gupta, and P.S. Mylavarapu, Blind multiridge detection for automatic nondestructive testing using ultrasonic signals. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 2006. 53(10): p. 1902-1911.
  14. Xu, X. and N. Gupta, Use of Machine Learning Methods in Syntactic Foam Design, in Encyclopedia of Materials: Plastics and Polymers, M.S.J. Hashmi, Editor. 2022, Elsevier: Oxford. p. 460-473.
  15. Chen, G.L. and N. Gupta, Image Processing and Machine Learning Methods Applied to Additive Manufactured Composites for Defect Detection and Toolpath Reconstruction, in Machine Learning Applied to Composite Materials, V. Kushvaha, et al., Editors. 2022, Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore. p. 19-44.
  16. Yanamandra, K., G.L. Chen, X. Xu, G. Mac, and N. Gupta, Reverse engineering of additive manufactured composite part by toolpath reconstruction using imaging and machine learning. Composites Science and Technology, 2020. 198: p. 108318.
  17. Rentala, V.K., P. Mylavarapu, and J.P. Gautam, Issues in estimating probability of detection of NDT techniques – A model assisted approach. Ultrasonics, 2018. 87: p. 59-70.
  18. Xu, X., C. Koomson, M. Doddamani, R.K. Behera, and N. Gupta, Extracting elastic modulus at different strain rates and temperatures from dynamic mechanical analysis data: A study on nanocomposites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019. 159: p. 346-354.
  19. Pearce, H., K. Yanamandra, N. Gupta, and R. Karri, FLAW3D: A Trojan-Based Cyber Attack on the Physical Outcomes of Additive Manufacturing. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2022. 27(6): p. 5361-5370.