Vol. 20 No. 3 (2023): Journal of Non Destructive Testing and Evaluation (JNDE), Sept 2023
Research Papers

Assessment of residual compressive strength of geopolymer concrete exposed to elevated temperature using Artificial Neural Network approach

Kishor S. Kulkarni
CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee

Published 10-09-2023

Keywords

  • Geopolymer concrete,
  • elevated temperature,
  • compressive strength,
  • artificial neural network

How to Cite

Kishor S. Kulkarni, Sana D. Sayyad, & M. Reyazur Rahman. (2023). Assessment of residual compressive strength of geopolymer concrete exposed to elevated temperature using Artificial Neural Network approach. Journal of Non-Destructive Testing and Evaluation (JNDE), 20(3), 50–57. Retrieved from https://jnde.isnt.in/index.php/JNDE/article/view/47

Abstract

The population growth and industrial activities nowadays creates a considerable volume of rubbish, producing disposal challenges and major environmental hazards. The cement industry is a major generator of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide. The use of waste resources, which avoids disposal worries while lowering greenhouse gases emissions into the atmosphere. This is a key factor in the development of cement-free Geopolymer Concrete (GPC). In the present work, GPC was made using a 75:25 proportions of fly ash (FA) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGFBS). The cube specimens were exposed to various temperatures ranging from 200 °C, 400°C, 600°C and 800 °C. The mechanical characteristics were then assessed. The compressive strength of GPC exposed to elevated temperatures is predicted using an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) technique in this study. The assessment of the residual compressive strength of GPC exposed to elevated temperatures was also done using non-destructive tests (NDT), such as the Rebound Hammer (RH) and Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV). In this study, the 255 experimental data from the other studies are also used for the ANN model's training, testing, and verification. The results of the study validate the use of ANN models to estimate the concrete's residual compressive strength in a manner that is quite similar to experimental data. The results show that the average prediction error for an unknown set of data was about 3.5 MPa.

References

  1. Sasi Rekha, M., & Sumathy, S. R. (2021). A study on cement-free geopolymer concrete incorporated with industrial waste cured at open environment for different molarities of sodium hydroxide. Global NEST Journal, 23 (2), 265-274.
  2. Gunasekara, C., Atzarakis, P., Lokuge, W., Law, D. W., & Setunge, S. (2021). Novel analytical method for mix design and performance prediction of high calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. Polymers, 13(6), 900.
  3. Rajamane, N. P., Nataraja, M. C., & Lakshmanan, N. (2011). An introduction to geopolymer concrete. Indian Concr J, 85(11), 25-28.
  4. Yasaswini, K., & Rao, A. V. (2020). Behaviour of geopolymer concrete at elevated temperature. Materials Today: Proceedings, 33, 239-244.
  5. Ahmad, A., Ahmad, W., Chaiyasarn, K., Ostrowski, K. A., Aslam, F., Zajdel, P., & Joyklad, P. (2021). Prediction of geopolymer concrete compressive strength using novel machine learning algorithms. Polymers, 13(19), 3389.
  6. Cong, P., & Cheng, Y. (2021). Advances in geopolymer materials: A comprehensive review. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 8(3), 283-314.
  7. Amin, M., Elsakhawy, Y., Abu el-hassan, K., & Abdelsalam, B. A. (2022). Behavior evaluation of sustainable high strength geopolymer concrete based on fly ash, metakaolin, and slag. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 16, e00976.
  8. Luo, Y., Li, S. H., Klima, K. M., Brouwers, H. J. H., & Yu, Q. (2022). Degradation mechanism of hybrid fly ash/slag based geopolymers exposed to elevated temperatures. Cement and Concrete Research, 151, 106649.
  9. Verma, M., Dev, N., Rahman, I., Nigam, M., Ahmed, M., & Mallick, J. (2022). Geopolymer concrete: a material for sustainable development in Indian construction industries. Crystals, 12(4), 514.
  10. Cao, V. D., Pilehvar, S., Salas-Bringas, C., Szczotok, A. M., Do, N. B. D., Le, H. T., ... & Kjøniksen, A. L. (2018). Influence of microcapsule size and shell polarity on the time-dependent viscosity of geopolymer paste. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 57(29), 9457-9464.
  11. Singh, B., Ishwarya, G., Gupta, M., & Bhattacharyya, S. K. (2015). Geopolymer concrete: A review of some recent developments. Construction and building materials, 85, 78-90.
  12. de Oliveira Dias, A. R., Amancio, F. A., de Carvalho Rafael, M. F., & Cabral, A. E. B. (2018). Study of propagation of ultrasonic pulses in concrete exposed at high temperatures. Procedia Structural Integrity, 11, 84-90.
  13. Savva, A., Manita, P., & Sideris, K. K. (2005). Influence of elevated temperatures on the mechanical properties of blended cement concretes prepared with limestone and siliceous aggregates. Cement and Concrete Composites, 27(2), 239-248.
  14. Ahmad, A., Ahmad, W., Chaiyasarn, K., Ostrowski, K. A., Aslam, F., Zajdel, P., & Joyklad, P. (2021), “Prediction of geopolymer concrete compressive strength using novel machine learning algorithms.” Polymers, 13(19), 3389.
  15. Krishna, A. S., & Rao, V. R. (2019), “Strength prediction of geopolymer concrete using ANN.” International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 7, 661-667.
  16. Toufigh, V., & Jafari, A. (2021), “Developing a comprehensive prediction model for compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete (FAGC).” Construction and Building Materials, 277, 122241.